California Democratic Senators Newman and Pan Caught Fabricating Racism To Exterminate Civil Rights Bill

Tom Stavola, Jr. recently contributed this article on VacTruth (www.vactruth.com) about the extermination of a civil rights bill by two senators: “The civil rights bill these Democratic Senators exterminated was simple: it would have guaranteed individuals and families the right to self-quarantine in their homes in the event of a pandemic, without fear of being criminalized for simply existing in their natural state (i.e., free of antibiotics or experimental vaccines).”  Read more here:  https://vactruth.com/2018/04/24/racist-california-democratic-senators/

 

 

Rebuttal to Boston Herald Editorial (dated May 16, 2017)

Freedom and Ethics Alliance Rebuttal to Boston Herald Editorial “Preying on Parents Fear” written by Robin Gray, Esq. (Freedom and Ethics Alliance Member)

In reviewing the editorial staff on May 8, 2017, it is apparent that the writer was influenced by ignorance and using this platform to instill fear into the very people who need facts and information to make the right decisions for their children.

The “anti vaxx” movement, as penned by the author of the editorial is not against vaccinations.  The movement is against forced vaccinations and vaccinations without full disclosure to parents about the risks and benefits.

The realization of the injuries caused by vaccines was so severe that in 1986, Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.   The law was created by Congress in response to lobbying by the pharmaceutical industry and medical trade associations to shield drug companies and doctors from civil product liability and malpractice lawsuits for injuries and deaths caused by federally recommended and state mandated vaccines.

The law, which acknowledged that vaccines carry serious risks, created a federal vaccine injury compensation program (VICP).  As of 2017, the VICP had awarded more than $3.7 billion to vaccine injured individuals and their families. Injuries and deaths from pertussis-containing vaccines lead in the numbers of compensation awards, followed by influenza vaccine, MMR vaccine and hepatitis B vaccine.

As many are aware, the pharmaceutical and medical trade companies have a very big lobby with a lot of money to influence Congress to ensure these companies are not touched.  The fact that this law was passed and acknowledged that injuries caused by vaccines was severe speaks volumes about the adverse affects facing individuals having forced vaccinations.

The Boston Herald editorial associates the Hollywood flavor of the month when it comes to causes with a real concern among parents about the drugs being injected into their children without full disclosure.  There is more disclosure about the side effects of Viagra, Cialis and toe fungus medicine than there is about vaccinations, which can have permanent life altering consequences. Full disclosure and safety are what the “anti-vaxx” groups are seeking from the medical community.

For the editorial writers to state that the public is being lied to by groups disclosing the truth about vaccines is itself a lie. To further state that anyone who does not vaccinate their children should be a hanging offense, is irresponsible journalism border lining on terroristic threats of intimidation and coercion.

Is Animal Vaccine Testing Ethical?

dX2_big

 Vaccines kill approximately 2.5 million animals annually.

Prior to the initiation of human based clinical trials, a significant amount of preclinical research is conducted utilizing living animals.

These are in vivo analyses (that is, conducted using the animals) which have multifarious purposes:

 – Live, attenuated vaccines are generally produced via a method whereby generations of viruses are grown in cell culture, or in animals, such that the viruses are gradually weakened. This process of viral weakening in the animals hosts becomes quite cruel and devastating. Inactivated and toxoid vaccines – typically created by killing the microbe with chemicals – are tested on animals which cause extreme suffering and death.

– “Abnormal toxicity tests” are often utilized on guinea pigs and mice. They are injected with a biological product and observed for a week. The test is usually performed numerous times until: a) no animals display signs of toxicity, b) no animals experience weight loss by the end of the observation period, and c) all animals survive.

– Tests such as the “mouse weight gain” utilized for the whole cell pertussis vaccine, subjects mice to a process whereby they are injected and subsequently observed 3 days later to determine if they are dead, alive, or have experienced weight gain. This is often performed more than one time.

-Oral polio vaccine testing includes a neurovirulence test, which subjects rhesus or cynomolgus monkeys to excruciating levels of pain. These monkeys receive an injection in their spines and are subsequently observed for the ensuing three week period to determine whether paralysis has been induced or not. Thereafter, the monkeys are killed and further examined.

-With inactivated vaccines, “potency tests” are often implemented to determine the effectiveness of the inactivated microbe in precluding disease contraction. Multitudes of rabbits, rats, mice, guinea pigs, and chickens are injected with a vaccine and then “challenged” with the corresponding pathogen against which they have been vaccinated. As one can imagine, the result is usually devastating for the animal.

-Another example of potency testing: to test one batch of the live, rabies vaccine, the virus is injected directly into the skulls of 160 mice. Some mice receive the vaccine while some do not (in order to ascertain vaccine “effectiveness”). As per PETA, “These cranial injections are extremely painful and completely irrelevant to the normal route of infection. Approximately half of the animals develop and/or die of rabies, a painful neurological disease involving tremors, loss of control over one’s body, the inability to swallow, and severe weight loss.”

primateresearch

The bottom line is that animal cruelty and killing it is perfectly acceptable per FDA/USDA standards for both drug and biological testing.

Upon learning the aforementioned information, a vaccine proponent might counter an animal activist with the following: vaccines are a necessary evil which must be developed in order to prevent the onset of widespread infectious disease. That is unequivocally the answer they will provide.

If one were to presuppose for a second that vaccines are beneficial (which they aren’t), should we be required to utilize evil means in attempt to derive a putative good result? The means justify the ends in the case of a vaccine proponent’s justification for the atrocities cited herein. However, one should be able to utilize good means to produce a good end result; one will find that is indeed possible with anything biologically necessary in nature. Ideal disease prevention emanates from stimulation and repeated challenge of a robust immune system, fortified by proper nutrition, mineral and vitamin intake, exercise, and moderate sunlight exposure, among innumerable other safe and effective techniques.

There are innumerable, ethical alternatives to animal testing – arguably more effective as well – explained on the following website:

http://www.neavs.org/alternatives/in-testing

2.5 million animal deaths per year are not a requirement of public health safety. Join the crusade: fight for what is ethically and scientifically right.

shutterstock_269664821

 

 

WELCOME

Vaccine Risk is your source for unbiased, objective, scientifically and legally sound information pertaining to your health, your pets, and your unborn children. Vaccine Risk pursues the truth in all of these issues, regardless of where it may lead. We do not maintain any political or financial conflicts of interest, which further legitimizes and fortifies the information presented. We are dedicated to real education; namely, education that is propaganda free – devoid of hype, hyperbole, deception, or ulterior motives. We do not utilize fear or manipulate peoples’ emotions in order to convince them to do something which would be beneficial for us, and deleterious for them. Why is this important? As you will read on our website, there are numerous sources of information which you will come across both in life and online that do not have your best interest (or your pets) at heart; it is your duty to differentiate between the good sources and the bad. We aid you in that disambiguation process. Our principal incentivize here at Vaccine Risk is to assist, guide, and empower you to make the correct decisions for your life; the way in which we hope to accomplish that task is by disseminating accurate information about the aforementioned issues, advocating for the passage of ethical legislation, and precluding the advance of unethical, inequitable bills.

The impetus for this organization was Holly Stavola, a beloved member of our family. Her life ended tragically and needlessly because of a vaccine – the second MMR vaccine dose – which was a requirement for Holly to attend kindergarten in New Jersey.This tragedy in our own lives prompted us to create Vaccine Risk so we could reach more people with educational materials so that they never have to suffer the pain we experienced with the loss of our family member. On these pages, you will find unbiased analyses of the vaccine debate, and it is our hope that – armed with this information – you will make the right choices for your families and share this information with those you love.

We hope that you find our website enlightening, thought-provoking, and beneficial for your life and the lives of your loved ones. Most importantly, we hope that – upon reading the information provided here – you will be incentivized to partake in this multifaceted, interminable battle for both freedom and ethics, for all God’s creatures.